Search "user:mrbasso"

I wouldn't call it inferior. It has a lot of success in online chess. Certainly more than 1.e4 and 1.d4. OTB you need to be patient if you play an opening like this. But in online chess the bad answer…

@Cedur216 said in #63: > that means it's alright, isn't it? Not sure... Since I was on provisional in classical I lost 94 points to a now banned cheater and another 94 points against a 1400 because th…

At your rating an opening repertoire is a waste of time. Better learn the strategical ideas of the openings you play!

@Brian-E said in #57: > It would be of doubtful value because for non-specialists it's impossible to be certain whether someone is cheating or not. > > The first category you mention, which you must i…

I could show you dozens of counterexamples where obvious cheaters were not banned and others were banned although they didn't cheat IF I'm allowed to post games but I'm not...

Of course all this automatic cheating detections fail if the suspected player only cheats occasionally and/or possibly makes some belivable mistakes on purpose.

?? If you are giving up the advantage it's always a mistake. Of course every strong player plays 2.cxd5 here winning a tempo or a pawn.

Fischer used a long time to become the best and stopped playing after dominating for only 3 years. That's all you can say.

@AsDaGo said in #5: > I play 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 d5 3. Bf4 c5 4. e3 Nc6 5. c3 Qb6 against the London (of course reachable through many other move orders as well). You could also play ...Qb6 earlier even …

@Cedur216 said in #2: > Accuracy is never worth bragging Non...se! In a long game with decent play of the opponent it is. But here black opened the game horribly and played the game badly from start t…